Akritas Macedonian blog: The solution of the "Republic of Northern Macedonia" U.S. proposed

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

The solution of the "Republic of Northern Macedonia" U.S. proposed

The package also includes changing the language to "northmacedonian" The intention of the U.S., where a positive response in Athens, be referred to as the FYROM as "Republic of Northern Macedonia" allegedly informed the Greek Prime Minister as the chairman of U.S. Barack Obama and Foreign Minister Hillary Clinton. Information indicates, however, that the Papandreou reserved respond after weigh all the data.

Under Step, Washington appears willing to reconsider its stance on the FYROM name, recognizing that the enlargement of NATO in Southeast Europe can not proceed if there is no solution.

In this context, the B.Obama and H. Clinton informed the Greek Prime Minister that if they accept the proposal may ......
notify the Security Council that in future recognize FYROM as "Republic of Northern Macedonia" on the ground that speaks the Northmacedonian language.

According to U.S. sources, Papandreou reserved respond after weigh all the data. The same sources report that Washington is eager to join the Western Balkans into NATO because the "new defense strategy" of carrying the missile defense system in Eastern Europe and the Eastern Mediterranean from Poland, the Czech Republic and the Baltic, which was originally intended to be installed .

Noted that three countries in the region have responded positively to relevant soundings of Washington-Romania, Bulgaria and Turkey, the latter provided that the "system" will be floating inside, which "can not just move east Cyprus and the Aegean.

SOURCE:TA NEA

2 comments:

Alfred di GenisMarch 16, 2010 at 1:48 PM
In an interview, assistant (or alternate) FM Droutsas has contradicted everything in the Ta Nea article. He has also said that Greece is discussing only the name of the new republic, as required in the Interim Agreement, and nothing else. It is well known that the introduction to the negotiations of issues of language and culture are attempts by FYROM to muddy the waters and to stall.
ReplyDelete
Replies
AnonymousApril 2, 2010 at 3:35 AM
First of all, I just wanted to say, if the Macedonians (Scopjians) believe that they are a distinct ethnic group from the Greeks, why then Alexander the Great send presents to the temple of Athena saying "These presents are from all Greeks, minus the Lacedemonians (Spartans)". As we can see, this great leader indetifies himself as Greek. 2nd, he send presents to the Godess Athena, which happens to be a Greek Godess. Third, even if he was not a Greek, and say a different ethnic hegemonic power, why have soldiers from other Greek cities if he hated them that much as Macedonians (Skopjans) claim. one may say "well, he was able to defeat via force, and made them fight under his leadership". Lets say thats true, but why spare the Spartans, since they use to be a great military force?

Thats what few things I had to say. thank you
ReplyDelete
Replies

Add comment

Commentators have the exclusive responsibility of their writings, the material that they mention, as well as and the opinions that they express.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Regarding the Greek debt Crisis....

Greece, a peripheral european state was encouraged to join a badly designed single currency by the rich elite of countries that dominated it. Those countries, having set up borrowing rules for the currency union, were the first to break them and did so with impunity.

Through complacency and inept financial regulation, and lacking good investment opportunities in their own stuttering economies, they then encouraged their banks to lend recklessly to the country on the periphery.

When those investments went sour, the elite governments -influence from Germany- with theirs globalizing neoliberal leadeships, rushed to bail out their banks first by loading up the debtor government with yet more loans to pay them back and then by imposing a foreign overlord to extract repayments through legal force.

We need History Lectures based on FACTS not political motives!

In November 5-8 2009 at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City took place the so-called "7th Macedonian-North American Conference on Macedonian Studies".
Although a number of presenters strictly deal with subjects of the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, there are politically motivated lectures that attack and disparage the people of Greece, the Greek Cultural identity and as they twist historical facts through their disturbing presentation.
These motivated lectures are influence under the umbrella of the Slavmacedonism [5], a post-modern ultra nationalist ideology.

Read more here.

Modern Macedonian question - What is it all about?

Ancient Macedonia was a Greek kingdom situated in the north end of Greece. It became the most powerful Greek state during the 4th century bc after the decline of Athina (Athens) and Sparta. Under the leadership of King Philippos II and his son Alexandros III (Alexander the Great) the Macedonian army conquered most of the world and created the world's largest empire ever, including South-East Europe, most of Asia and North Africa.
After the death of Alexandros, Macedonia followed the fate of the rest of Greece. It became a Roman province, later a Byzantine province, it was occupied by the Ottoman empire and finally it became part of the indepented Greek state in 1912.
Today a Slavic nation attempts to adopt the history and culture of Macedonia as their own and present themselves to the world as "ethnic Macedonians" and "descedants of ancient Macedonians"
This is a blatant attack against Greece and its world wide respected history.
The FYROM Slavs who claim to be "Macedonians" have no historical, cultural or linguistic relation with ancient Macedonia. They descended into the region not before the 6th cent. A.D. long after ancient Macedonia was homogenized with the rest of Greece. Their 'Republic of Macedonia' occupies less than 10% of ancient Macedonia.
Therefore their claim on ancient Macedonia's name, history, culture and symbols can not be justified.

Aegean Macedonia.........

is a FYROMacedonian Slav nationalist term used to refer to the region of Macedonia in Greece, in the context of a United Macedonia.
The origins of the term seem to be rooted in the 1940s but its modern usage is widely considered ambiguous and irredentist.
The term has occasionally appeared on maps circulated in the FYROM, which envisioned Greek Macedonia (referred to as "Aegean Macedonia") as part of a "Greater Macedonia", and is regarded as a challenge of of the legitimacy of Greek sovereignity over the area.

Akritas Macedonian blog

Wednesday, March 10, 2010

The solution of the "Republic of Northern Macedonia" U.S. proposed

2 comments:

Google

Visitors from 1 April 2008